Remember that story a few years back about the mysterious honeybee affliction known as Colony Collapse Disorder? It didn’t remain in the headlines for long but it should have: Honeybees pollinate up to 1/3 of the world’s crops. Lose them and we lose a great deal of human civilization to malnutrition.
I was reminded of this sad phenomena over the holidays when, from city to city, county to county, I kept stepping over dead and dying honeybees. Not just one, but several. Not merely one week, but several weeks in a row. Three years earlier — and what first brought CCD to my attention when I came online in search of an explanation — I took a walk in a local park and saw hundreds of bees dying on the ground. It was all I could do to keep my dog from stepping on them, a number of them still trying, fruitlessly so, to fly. A few weeks later at another park, I saw the same phenomena. The carnage became so commonplace that year that I eventually lost count.
Now here comes a late-breaking 2009 headline nearly lost amidst end-of-year festivities:
Bayer ‘Disappointed’ in Ruling on Chemical That May Harm Bees | Bloomberg.com
Bayer’s newest chemical wonder, Spirotetramat, was not on the market when CCD surfaced, but what is alarming about this story is that the EPA apparently approved it, critics allege, knowing that it could heighten or accelerate the harm to a critical link in the food chain.
Our food chain.
This story begs the question: How many scientists, executives and EPA administrators over the years have let “just one” pass, downplaying the cumulative harm to animal and human immune systems alike? It also is a reminder that our collective attention span is painfully short. In 2006 the EPA urged DuPont, maker of the ubiquitous nonstick coating Teflon®, among others, to enter a voluntary agreement to phase out the controversial chemical ingredients known as PFOA/PFOS. Here we are in 2010 — the date when 95 percent of this “likely carcinogen” was supposed to be eliminated from factory emissions, and eventually our food packaging, bathroom cleaners, stain repellents, cookware, electronics and personal care products — and no dice. Conveniently, the “real” phase-out date is 2015.
Do we really need to ask why there is a cancer epidemic? An autism epidemic? More people suffering from degenerative diseases despite better nutrition in the modern era? Increased autoimmune illnesses, among them an epidemic of childhood asthma? Or do we need only look in the mirror?
This isn’t a pitch toward “radical environmentalism” and it isn’t a slam on Big Corporate Enterprise. This is about self interest. No one will watch our backs if we ourselves won’t. As consumers, what we buy dominates the market. What we refuse to purchase will fall by the wayside for lack of consumer demand. True, it sounds far-fetched to think that we wield that kind of power. But big trends start with little people — ordinary folks who have the foresight to lead the way.
Our vote is our pocketbook.
Above and beyond any political or ideological position, those who hope and pray for a happy, healthy life for their children and grandchildren have cause to care. The emerging science of epigenetics suggests that undesirable genetic traits, when awakened by environmental triggers such as stress, obesity, malnutrition and toxins in our environment, may alter the expression of DNA inherited by our children and their children. No longer is the biblical metaphor that holds that the “‘sins’ of the fathers shall be visited upon the sons” merely figurative. If an disaster of apocalyptic proportions is afoot — as some have asserted — it is manmade, not God-made.
Speculation as to the cause of CCD abounds, but this much science makes increasingly clear as we plow deeper into the 21st Century: There is no such thing as a zero impact. Even seemingly inconsequential actions undergo a magnifier effect in the real world, not unlike an expanding ripple on a pond. This sets in motion repercussions for bees and people alike. But that realization, as dire as it sounds, is also key to our success: Assuming we created the problem, we can fix it.
Our greatest challenge is to simply acknowledge that there is a problem.
Fortunately for us, we’re not living in 1965 or even 1985. It has never been easier to jot down a product name and research its profile with minimal time, effort and expense on the Internet. Just a few minutes a week or month may literally mean the difference between those companies who profit at our expense vs. those who are forced to evolve their products to meet the expectations and needs of smarter consumers.
It’s a new year and a new decade. The future is in our hands.
Secret Life of Bees | Whittier Daily News
Use of Potentially Harmful Chemicals Kept Secret Under Law | Washington Post
DuPont’s PFOA May Face New Rules | DelawareOnline
National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals | CDC
Unusual Suspects: Pollution May be Making You Fat | Popular Science
National Toxicology Program | Department of Health and Human Services
Pesticide Action Network North America | PAN Pesticide Database
Everyday Pollution Solutions | The Environmental Working Group
One thought on “The Buzz About Bees”
Great post! Voting with our wallets is pretty much the only type of real voting available to us. Unfortunately, the rich have way more voting power and the poor have little choices.
The wealthy are terribly inefficient with their wallets, having food flown in from all over the world. Frequent flying. Rare and inefficient versions of everything. Their justification being that its ok because they pay heftily for the opulence. . …But we all end up paying for it.
The poor aren’t much better. If slave goods shipped in from Asia are the only ones you can afford, you will buy them. Better to have cheap stuff than no stuff.
Its true that consumers can get good info about products on the internet, but look at the competition. Good info requires the consumer’s effort to be discovered, bad info is plastered over almost ever inch of our public space. You may be able to discover ‘Tide is dangerous’ through research, but how will that message ever make it through when corporate is screaming at us about how wonderful Tide is.
These corporate types are the people who need to look into mirrors. If the government found your product unfit, that is a good thing. The public was spared from harm. No one should be disappointed. . .. .That headline belongs on The Onion, they wouldn’t even need to change it!